“is there a possibility of identity outside being a being of language? desire itself is working within language and we gain enjoyment from language, from how the other identifies with codes and symbolic identifications. blanchot studies silence. silence is there where we keep on taking part in life with its enjoyments, but we no longer need to produce meaning or find meaning in it. almost like walking through a desert where the silent desert itself speaks, where the nothing is already saying enough to keep us going. but i am not idealizing the loneliness of walkng in a desert. it is for me a loneliness that prepares us to socialize. if the loneliness only is fetishized, if silence is fetishized, if the nothing is fetishized or elevated, then i am doubtful of such melancholic elevation.” – http://ift.tt/1ZsVg3E

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s